The Nazca Lines are world well known

history channel documentary 2015 For instance, there are the well known statues on Easter Island. All things considered, the representations are human, yet not exactly sufficiently human. In the event that they are a representation of precursor love (as is usually refered to) then either the predecessors were extremely unusual or else the stone artisans were somewhat poor carvers, or they were one of the first to have concocted conceptual craftsmanship. There's something suspicious some place in crediting the Easter Island statues as speaking to an entirely human structure. If not entirely human, what's the alternative?You have a portion of the antiquated Egyptian "divine beings" with jackal and bird of prey heads - what number of people do you see down at your neighborhood shopping center with creature heads?

The Nazca Lines are world well known. They fundamentally are etchings (speaking to different creatures and different articles) made in the dry desert fields in Southern Peru that, much like flattened crops, must be truly refreshing from the air. Truth be told they were just found in the 1930's from air ship flying overhead. There's most likely people built the lines, which took a considerable measure of time, exertion and vitality, yet to what reason? Positively they were not runways for flying saucers and galactic arrangements and related clarifications fall flat as well. Since they were plainly intended to be seen from the air and since we're discussing their development somewhere in the range of 400 to 650 years AD - kind of our pre-flight time - then the most intelligent clarification is that they were fine arts for the sky divine beings to see and appreciate.